Decision details

Future of the Council's Eight Elderly Person's Homes and Provision of Intermediate Care Facilities

Decision Maker: Assistant City Mayor - Adult Social Care

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: Yes

Is subject to call in?: Yes

Decision:

1. To close and sell the Council’s Eight Elderly Persons Homes subject to the phased approach as set out below.

2. To approve the Intermediate Care and Short Term Residential Care Commissioning Strategy (ICSTRCCS)

3. To approve, in accordance with the ICSTRCCS,  the development of Intermediate Care Facilities for 60 beds and to close Brookside Court accordingly.

Phase I

  • Close Elizabeth House, Herrick Lodge and Nuffield House in 2014 and move the residents to other residential care homes.
  • Market for sale Abbey House and Cooper House as going concerns in 2014/15.

Phase II – To proceed, subject to confirmatory Executive decisions, following an evaluation of Phase I and its consideration by the ASC Scrutiny Commission.

  • Close Preston Lodge in 2015/16.
  • Market for sale Arbor House and Thurn Court as going concerns. Procurement expected to commence in 2015/16 with sale anticipated in 2016/17.
  • Close Brookside Court following the opening of new Intermediate Care facilities.

In making these decisions, assurance is given that:

a)     Current residents and their families/carers will be fully supported through all changes, including detailed plans developed carefully with and for every resident moving to another residential home.

b)    The Council will invest in Extra Care housing to increase the number of supported self-contained flats available for older people in the city.  This reflects the increasing demand for this type of accommodation.    

c)     The Council’s quality monitoring of the independent residential homes will be enhanced to ensure the provision of good quality of care and quality standards will be published. This will include raising awareness of the standards and staff training and development.  

Alternative options:

1.     No change

This is not an option, due to the declining numbers and cost of the Council providing residential care compared to the independent sector.

2.     Close all of the homes

This is not feasible nor desirable.  There are insufficient vacancies in the independent sector to accommodate in the region of 161 people at this time.  However, the phased approach would mean that as at 23.9.2013, 36 people would need to move to alternative accommodation in phase I and the independent sector could cope with this number.  The market has demonstrated there exists an appetite within independent sector for purchase of some of the Council’s Homes as going concerns.  

3.     Sell or lease all of the Homes as going concerns

This is not an option because a soft market testing exercise showed there is no demand to buy or lease all of the eight homes.  However, there was expression from providers to buy some of the homes.

 

The Decision Maker has considered all relevant material in coming to this decision, including the Adult Social Care Scrutiny Commission Report dated July 2013.

Publication date: 07/10/2013

Date of decision: 15/10/2013

Effective from: 23/10/2013

Accompanying Documents: