Decision details

Decision Maker: City Mayor (Individual Decision)

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: Yes

Is subject to call in?: Yes

Decision:

Reasons for the decision:

Alternative options:

Publication date: 14/07/2026

Date of decision: 22/07/2026

Effective from: 30/07/2026

Current call-in Count: 5

This decision has been called in by:

• Councillor Nigel Porter who writes We the undersigned wish to Call-in the Executive Decision for the Leicester Railway Station and St Margarets Junction Improvement Funding Decision. Leicester"s taxpayers deserve full transparency from the Labour council regarding the rising costs of the railway station redevelopment to over £32 million and the proposed diversion of nearly £10 million away from vital junction improvement at St Margaret’s Way Major public concerns. i) The council must explain why the St Margaret's Way junction suddenly needs £10 million less than it did two years ago? ii) Clarification is needed from the council as to why the original station scheme failed to attract any contractors, also how future procurement and bidding will be safeguarded against further rising costs and or delays? iii) Before committing over £32 million to this proposed project, the council must publish crystal-clear evidence demonstrating that this proposed project is financially viable, delivers good value for money and has distinct benefits for the residents of Leicester."
• Councillor Patrick Kitterick who writes We the undersigned wish to Call-in the Executive Decision for the Leicester Railway Station and St Margarets Junction Improvement Funding Decision. Leicester"s taxpayers deserve full transparency from the Labour council regarding the rising costs of the railway station redevelopment to over £32 million and the proposed diversion of nearly £10 million away from vital junction improvement at St Margaret’s Way Major public concerns. i) The council must explain why the St Margaret's Way junction suddenly needs £10 million less than it did two years ago? ii) Clarification is needed from the council as to why the original station scheme failed to attract any contractors, also how future procurement and bidding will be safeguarded against further rising costs and or delays? iii) Before committing over £32 million to this proposed project, the council must publish crystal-clear evidence demonstrating that this proposed project is financially viable, delivers good value for money and has distinct benefits for the residents of Leicester."
• Councillor Scott Kennedy-Lount who writes We the undersigned wish to Call-in the Executive Decision for the Leicester Railway Station and St Margarets Junction Improvement Funding Decision. Leicester"s taxpayers deserve full transparency from the Labour council regarding the rising costs of the railway station redevelopment to over £32 million and the proposed diversion of nearly £10 million away from vital junction improvement at St Margaret’s Way Major public concerns. i) The council must explain why the St Margaret's Way junction suddenly needs £10 million less than it did two years ago? ii) Clarification is needed from the council as to why the original station scheme failed to attract any contractors, also how future procurement and bidding will be safeguarded against further rising costs and or delays? iii) Before committing over £32 million to this proposed project, the council must publish crystal-clear evidence demonstrating that this proposed project is financially viable, delivers good value for money and has distinct benefits for the residents of Leicester."
• Councillor Abdul Osman who writes We the undersigned wish to Call-in the Executive Decision for the Leicester Railway Station and St Margarets Junction Improvement Funding Decision. Leicester"s taxpayers deserve full transparency from the Labour council regarding the rising costs of the railway station redevelopment to over £32 million and the proposed diversion of nearly £10 million away from vital junction improvement at St Margaret’s Way Major public concerns. i) The council must explain why the St Margaret's Way junction suddenly needs £10 million less than it did two years ago? ii) Clarification is needed from the council as to why the original station scheme failed to attract any contractors, also how future procurement and bidding will be safeguarded against further rising costs and or delays? iii) Before committing over £32 million to this proposed project, the council must publish crystal-clear evidence demonstrating that this proposed project is financially viable, delivers good value for money and has distinct benefits for the residents of Leicester."
• Councillor Hemant Rae Bhatia who writes We the undersigned wish to Call-in the Executive Decision for the Leicester Railway Station and St Margarets Junction Improvement Funding Decision. Leicester"s taxpayers deserve full transparency from the Labour council regarding the rising costs of the railway station redevelopment to over £32 million and the proposed diversion of nearly £10 million away from vital junction improvement at St Margaret’s Way Major public concerns. i) The council must explain why the St Margaret's Way junction suddenly needs £10 million less than it did two years ago? ii) Clarification is needed from the council as to why the original station scheme failed to attract any contractors, also how future procurement and bidding will be safeguarded against further rising costs and or delays? iii) Before committing over £32 million to this proposed project, the council must publish crystal-clear evidence demonstrating that this proposed project is financially viable, delivers good value for money and has distinct benefits for the residents of Leicester."

Accompanying Documents:

• St Margaret's Junction Executive Decision report - July 2026 FINAL PDF 99 KB
• St Margaret's junction Decision Notice PDF 99 KB