Agenda and minutes

Westcotes Community Meeting - Tuesday, 20 March 2012 6:30 pm

Venue: Main Hall, East West Community Project, 10 Wilberforce Road, Leicester LE3 0BG

Contact: Elaine Baker, Democratic Services Officer, and Peter Cozens, Member Support Officer, 

Items
No. Item

39.

ELECTION OF CHAIR

Councillors will elect a Chair for the meeting.

Minutes:

Councillor Russell was elected as Chair for the meeting.

40.

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from Sergeant Barnes (Leicestershire Constabulary) and Anne Murphy (Street Pastors).

 

The Meeting sent its best wishes to Anne Murphy for a speedy recovery.

41.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

The first main item on theagenda is Declarations of Interest where Councillors have to say if there is anything on the agenda they have a personal interest in. For example if a meeting was due to discuss a budget application put forward by a community group and one of the Councillors was a member of that group, they would not be able to take part in the decision on that budget application.

 

Councillors are asked to declare any interest they may have in the business on the agenda, and/or indicate that Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 applies to them.

 

Minutes:

Councillor Connelly and Councillor Russell each declared a personal non-prejudicial interest in the application for grant funding from the Church of the Martyrs Hall Management Committee, under agenda item 10, “Ward Community Meeting Budget 2010/11”, as their children attended a Friday evening karate club at the hall.

42.

MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING

Members are asked to confirm the following minutes as correct records of the respective meetings:-

 

a)    the ordinary meeting held on 29 November 2011 (previously circulated); and

 

b)    the special meeting held on 6 March 2012 (to follow).

Minutes:

The minutes of the ordinary meeting held on 29 November 2011 and the special meeting held on 6 March 2012 were each approved as a correct record.

43.

POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT OF VIADUCT AND ADJOINING LAND ON BEDE STREET

Tim Shattock, a representative of Sowdens, (a development company), will be at the meeting to discuss plans for the possible development of the viaduct and adjoining land in Bede Street.

Minutes:

Tim Shattock, a representative of Sowdens development company, introduced himself to the meeting and explained that the land under consideration was the former Kennings site, bounded by Braunstone Gate, Bede Street and the canal junction.

 

The current proposal was to build five terraced houses on the site, along with a four-storey block of 48 flats (with car parking for the main block).  There would be a commercial element to the ground floor of the block of flats.  It was proposed that viaduct would be demolished, but to date no agreement had been reached with the Council regarding this and no planning application had been submitted. 

 

The Chair explained that this item was being considered in order to give people the chance to make general comments that could inform the planning application.  People would have a chance to comment in detail when a formal planning application was submitted.

 

Tim Shattock showed an artist’s impression of how the new development would look, but the meeting suggested that views also were needed of how the development of the area by the river would look.  Jeanette Franklin, (Principal Valuer with Leicester City Council’s Property Development service), stressed that it was not planned to remove trees or vegetation on the other side of the river.  Tim Shattock offered to produce the image requested and prepare a montage of the views that could be circulated to those interested.  This could include views of what was there currently.

 

It was noted that it was proposed that the terraced houses would be two-storey and have three bedrooms.  This was welcomed by the Ward Councillors, as there was a recognised shortage of larger houses in the Ward.  However, it was noted that there were some flood risk issues that needed to be resolved.

 

Some concern was expressed that there would be insufficient parking for the number of flats proposed, as the current proposal was for 19 spaces.  It therefore was suggested that the ground floor of the development could be used for car parking.

 

It was asked whether there would be any restriction on the type of commercial activity in the development.  In reply, it was noted that there was a saturation zone policy in place regarding bars, but it was not known if a restriction could be put in place to prevent it being used for businesses such as the selling of fast food.

 

AGREED:

1)    That Tim Shattock (Sowdens) be asked to provide a montage of views of the proposed development, including views of what is currently on the site; and

 

2)    That the montage referred to above be put on the Westcotes and Castle Facebook pages.

44.

SECTION 106 FUNDING pdf icon PDF 834 KB

An update on funds from Section 106 Agreements allocated to Westcotes Ward will be given at the meeting.

Minutes:

The Chair introduced this item, explaining that funding provided under Section 106 had to be for something that related to the development under which it was obtained. 

 

Details of contributions made for the Westcotes Ward between 1 May 2007 and 20 March 2012 were tabled at the meeting and are attached at the end of these minutes for information.  It was noted that when the contributions were received depended on when the development was completed.

 

It also was noted that, when contributions were received for Parks and Green Spaces, it was not designated for a specific park or green space, in order to keep as much flexibility as possible.

 

Attention was drawn to the contribution to Parks and Green Spaces from the development on Upperton Road and it was suggested that it could be used to provide a ball park on the open area at the end of Sheffield Street.  This area currently was not used, as it was an open, barren area. 

 

Other alternatives could be to provide a facility such as a linear adventure trail alongside the river that could be used by children and adults, or a skate park to encourage people away from Bede Park.  Investigations could be made to see if it would be possible for youth and/or sports officers to be involved in the creation of this in either an advisory or project management capacity.

 

Having considered this, it was suggested that an increase in park and open space facilities could lead to an increased need for CCTV.  The Police reminded the Meeting that a problem with the cameras currently in Bede Park was that when the trees were in leaf it was difficult to see any activity.  However, De Montfort University, which owned the system, was willing to move the cameras when asked to do so by the Police.  Some cameras also were used along the Great Central Way, but they were dome cameras that often became misted up, so needed cleaning regularly.

 

It was recognised that other problems that could arise if more park and open space facilities were provided included increased noise, antisocial behaviour, litter, barbecues/open fires, and cars parked near the facilities.  Space also would become limited, even though open spaces in the Ward already were so popular they could not be used comfortably on warm days.

 

PC Mark Hurst (Leicestershire Constabulary) advised the Meeting that Bede Park was part of a local Problem Solving Profile due to the antisocial behaviour that accompanied such heavy use of the Park.  As part of this, Police officers tried to visit the Park every day and a log of incidents was kept.

 

AGREED:

1)    That Planning Officers be asked to:-

 

a)     provide a plan of the open spaces in the Ward, including ownership where known, so that consideration could be given to what facilities could be suggested for which locations; and

 

b)     consider the options suggested above for the provision of Parks and Green Space facilities through the Planning Contribution related to the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 44.

45.

GENERAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MATTERS

An update on planning and development issues in the Westcotes Ward not covered elsewhere on the agenda will be given at the meeting.

Minutes:

The Ward Members advised that:-

 

·           Jamie Lewis Residential had appealed against a decision not to allow an illuminated sign on his development on Upperton Road.  He had lost the appeal, but had put up another sign.  A retrospective application had been submitted for a large sign on the ground floor, which would be considered by the City Council’s Planning and Development Control Committee shortly;

 

·           Accommodation being built by the Co-op on Briton Street was to have been an elderly persons’ home, but it now was proposed for use for students;

 

·           The CPH Thurmaston site was under consideration by two competing developers.  One of these was Jamie Lewis Residential, who wanted to provide student accommodation there, and the other was a proposal for a doctor’s surgery.  The latter was being supported by the Primary Care Trust and would keep the old building.  Janie Lewis proposed to only keep part of the old building and use the rest of the site for retail;

 

·           The Planning Inspector’s decision in relation to the appeal made by the applicants against the decision not to allow a hostel at 20 Westcotes Drive was awaited.  It was hoped that a meeting could be arranged between the Planning Inspector and local residents;

 

·           There was some concern that the height of the new building in Western Road did not match the approved plans.  It was known that the back of the building would be high, but it had been thought that the front would be flush with the building line.  However, the front appeared to be flush with the pitched roof, so the building was not “stepped” as it had appeared on drawings.  This had been raised with the City Council’s Planning Officers, but it was recognised that illustrations were not necessarily accurate.  Any decision would be based on the approved plans;

 

·           The site in Western Road had been cleared by the previous owner, as there had been problems with break-ins at the buildings, drug misuse and antisocial behaviour.  It was thought that the previous developer had permission to build apartments, (not for students), but this had fallen through.  Jamie Lewis Residential had now bought the site, but to date had not submitted a planning application for it.

 

·           The City Council had agreed to make a Compulsory Purchase Order for the house on Norman Road that appeared to be derelict.  It would be sold at auction to be brought back in to use;

 

·           Some unused shops in the City centre had vinyl window coverings, to stop them looking run down.  Investigations would be made in to whether something similar could be funded through the Ward Community Budget.  They could then be used in premises such as the empty shop on Gaul Street; and

 

·           Approximately £225,000 was likely to be available from European Gateway Funding.  This would probably be used on Narborough Road or Braunstone Gate.  The City Council’s Economic Development team would consult all businesses on how this funding could be spent to improve the gateway.  There was no  ...  view the full minutes text for item 45.

46.

CITY WARDEN SERVICE

The City Warden will give an update on issues in the Westcotes Ward

Minutes:

Jamie Stubbs, (City Warden for Westcotes Ward), advised the meeting that the main problem she currently was encountering in the Ward was bins on streets.  The number of bins being left out had reduced by approximately two-thirds and work was on-going to reduce the number further.  Houses outside which bins were still being left tended to be ones without a front yard or garden.  It was planned to focus on the Latimer Street / Livingstone Street areas next.

 

Dog walkers on Great Central Way were leaving bags of dog waste and not using the bins provided, so in the next few weeks it was hoped to put up a gazebo from which to provide an educational programme.

 

Some members of the community explained that there were no bins in some locations, so people were leaving bags of dog waste by lamp posts.  In reply, it was noted that pictures of this were being taken to collect evidence and some people had been caught doing it.  Problems of how it could be cleaned up more quickly were being encountered and bags to distribute to people had been ordered.

 

It was noted that some large bins provided by the Council for flats caused obstructions when they got kicked out in to the road.  It was suggested that the City Council’s waste team could be asked to provide 240 litre bins for flats, instead of the very large ones, as they could be moved back in to place more easily when left in the road.

 

Problems also were being caused by people rummaging in the bins by the Co-op and leaving rubbish on the road.  The Chair suggested that the Ward Members could speak to the Co-op to see if, rather than throwing food away, it could link in to the food share scheme in the City.

 

AGREED:

                   That the Ward Members:-

 

a)    write to British Waterways to ask them to remove the rubbish, including dog waste, from the riverside; and

 

b)    encourage the Co-op to participate in the City food share scheme, in order to reduce the amount of food being thrown away.

47.

POLICE ISSUES UPDATE

Officers from Leicestershire Constabulary will be at the meeting to provide an update on Police issues in Westcotes Ward

Minutes:

PC Mark Hurst of Leicestershire Constabulary reported that:-

 

·           The number of burglaries had reduced, as had the number of robberies and the number of thefts from motor vehicles.  However, theft from persons had increased;

 

·           Antisocial behaviour had decreased, but the Police were still using the antisocial behaviour car;

 

·           Inspectors had classified Hinckley Road Local Policing Unit as one of the best areas in the force for dealing with antisocial behaviour; and

 

·           An operation had been running under which visits were made to householders who had been the victim of domestic burglary and advice offered.  Vulnerable households on the same streets also were visited.

 

Clarification was sought on whether Group4 would be used by the local force to police the streets.  In reply, it was noted that only two forces had offered a tender for this as a cost reduction measure for the next financial year.  Elections were being held in November 2012 for a Police and Crime Commissioner for each force and the Commissioner would decide if it was right for their force to let such contracts.

 

In reply to a question, the Chair advised the Meeting that Councils could now choose to regulate sexual entertainment venues in the City.  It had been decided to limit the number to no more than five and all of the venues licensed had to be located within the inner ring road.  All existing clubs had had to apply for a licence and had to meet certain conditions.  Of the previously existing five clubs, only two were granted a licence.  Angels, a local venue, had been unsuccessful and had applied for a judicial review of the decision.

 

48.

WARD COMMUNITY BUDGET 2011/12

Councillors are reminded that they will need to declare any interest they may have in budget applications, and/or indicate that Section 106 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 applies to them.

 

a)      An update on the 2011/12 Community Meeting budget will be provided.

 

b)     The following grant application is submitted for consideration:-

 

Project:           Community Dance sport & fitness Project

 

Applicant:      Essensual rejuvenation dance sport & Fitness

 

Amount requested:     

 

 

Item

Cost

(£)

Estimate/ Actual cost?

Request to Ward Meeting (£)

Head Coach

500

500

400

Assistant Coach

350

350

300

Assistant Coach

350

350

0

Equipment

518

518

300

Room hire

352

352

352

Total

2070

2070

1,352

 

Summary:

 

This application has also been considered by the Braunstone Park and Rowley Fields Community Meeting and a grant of £1,352 approved.

 

The project aims to promote and encourage community cohesion amongst Leicester’s young people and bring Leicester’s young people from diverse communities together to participate in organised Dance & Drama sessions.  There will be open Sessions at various venues across all areas of the City, leading onto a major final event.

 

There will a Finale held at the end of all the projects, that will bring all the young people from the various areas of each ward together and the final will be a single large scale event that will bring the young acts together to showcase the work they have achieved from all wards across the city.

 

The showcase will be held at an open event that all ages can attend.

 

The sessions will take Place on Tuesday evenings for 25 weeks at 2 hours a session at the Manor House Centre with the Support of the Manor House Neighbourhood team. There will be a cost of £2 to the people attending to cover the extra costs needed to fund this project and hopefully to help sustain the project in the future.

 

All of the work is monitored.  Photographic and video evidence is created and the total number of people who attend is recorded, along with the age, ethnicity, sex and postcode for each participant of an activity.  This enables the success of each event to be monitored.

 

The main target groups for the sessions are disengaged young people, ethnic minorities and females.

 

c)    Consideration will be given to any further grant applications received before the meeting

Minutes:

a)    Community Dance Sport and Fitness Project (Essensual Rejuvenation Dance Sport and Fitness) £1,352

 

AGREED:

that a grant of £1,352 to Essensual Rejuvenation Dance Sport and Fitness towards the Community Dance Sport and Fitness Project be supported, subject to confirmation that the Management Committee at The Manor House Neighbourhood Centre supports this project.

 

b)   2 New Alley Gates – Wolverton Road and Equity Road (Leicester City Council City Warden Service and Leicestershire Constabulary Westcotes Beat Team) £1,200

 

This application had been received after the agenda had been published, so was tabled at the meeting. 

 

The Chair advised that, since this application had been received, it had been found that it was possible that the police could obtain these gates more cheaply than the City Warden service could. 

 

AGREED:

1)    that a grant of £1,200 to the City Council’s City Warden Service and the Leicestershire Constabulary Westcotes Beat Team for the purchase of as many alley gates as possible be supported;

 

2)    that the alley gates purchased under resolution 1) above be installed in Wolverton Road and Equity Road and, if it is possible to purchase additional gates with the funding approved, these be installed at locations in the Ward agreed between the Ward Members, the City Warden service and the Leicestershire Constabulary Westcotes Beat Team.

 

c)    Graffiti Clean Up in Westcotes (Leicester City Council City Warden Service and Leicestershire Constabulary Westcotes Beat Team) £300

 

This application had been received after the agenda had been published, so was tabled at the meeting.

 

It was noted that a graffiti mural had been created in Harrow Road a few months ago.  This was in keeping with the business occupying the premises that the mural was on and it was hoped that similar work could be supported in other problem areas.

 

AGREED:

that a grant of £300 to the City Council’s City Warden Service and Leicestershire Constabulary Westcotes Beat Team towards a graffiti clean-up in the Westcotes Ward be supported.

 

d)   Stairlift for Church of the Martyrs Community Hall (Church of the Martyrs Hall Management Committee) £4,000

 

This application had been received after the agenda had been published, so was tabled at the meeting.

 

In response to a question, it was noted that standard rates for one-off and repeat bookings were charged for use of the church hall.  The hall was run on a non-profit making basis, with income being used to improve hall facilities.

 

AGREED:

that a grant of £4,000 to the Church of the Martyrs Hall Management Committee towards the provision of a stairlift at the hall be supported, subject to a plaque being put up in the hall recognising this funding.

 

e)    Clean Up after Riverside Festival (Leicester City Council Festivals and Events service) £3,500

 

The meeting noted that, as the annual Riverside festival grew larger, waste management costs increased.  A request had been received for a grant of £3,500 towards the clean-up costs for this year’s Festival and improved recycling opportunities.  It was recognised that this was a City-wide  ...  view the full minutes text for item 48.

49.

ANY OTHER BUSINESS

Minutes:

a)    Noticeboards

 

It was reported that a noticeboard had been put up outside the Catholic Church, but it was too far back to see and it was not known where the key for it was kept. 

 

It also was thought that two other boards had been purchased, but had not been put up.  The current location of these additional boards was not known.

 

Marie Murray (Area Manager with the City Council’s Housing service), offered to try to locate the key for the noticeboard outside the Catholic Church and to find out if there were additional noticeboards that needed putting up in the Ward.

 

b)   Daffodils on Narborough Road North

 

It was noted that the funding for daffodil bulbs agreed under minute 38(vii), “Ward Community Budget: Planting on Narborough Road North”, on 8 March 2011 was being held pending the completion of the Tesco development.

 

The Meeting suggested that, rather than daffodils, plants that could be attractive all year could be used, (for example, lavender).

50.

CLOSE OF MEETING

Minutes:

The meeting closed at 9.02 pm