Councillor
Waddington left the meeting prior to the consideration of this item.
Councillor
Rae Bhatia left the meeting prior to the consideration of this item.
Councillor
Cassidy Chaired the meeting from this item onwards.
The Director
of Tourism, Culture and Economy gave a presentation to update the commission on
Workspaces Capital Funding using the slides attached.
Additional
key points included:
- The Council had been growing a very successful workspace portfolio
over many years, and in particular in the last 18
months.
- Dock 3-5 opened in Autumn 2024 and was focussed on innovation
technology businesses, with a mix of office space and light commercial
space.
- Dock 3-5 funding had come from the Levelling-up fund in which one
scheme per MP could be applied for, the project of the MP in question had
been support for the Enterprise Zone at Space City around the National
Space Centre. The Council had been
required to provide match funding.
- The initial grant-payment was non-repayable, and the Council could
generate revenue and create jobs from the workspace. It could also generate a surplus that
could be invested in Council services.
- The city also had a strength in creative design. Pilot House had
previously been the largest undeveloped building in Council ownership in
the city centre and had been underused for many years. The council had been successful in
securing significant Levelling-up funding for this and had provided
match-funding, to transform the building into Canopy, with a focus on the
creative design sector.
- Canopy was undergoing fit-out works, particularly by the external
café-bar operator and associated electrical works.
- Canopy had created 26 workspaces both large and small which were
already proving popular. The target
occupancy for Canopy was 40% within the first year of opening, and it was
already at 38% occupancy several months before opening. This was the best
early performance for a new workspace scheme to date.
- The focus was on developing a community of like-minded businesses
that could be supported and could support each other.
- Canopy had conference facilities and an exhibition gallery and
workshops, so it would be a platform for growth.
The
Commission were invited to ask questions and make comments. Key points
included:
- At optimum occupancy (90%), the whole portfolio was expected to
generate a surplus of £600k per year for the Council. This had been factored into the budget
savings profile for the Council.
This did not cost the Council in terms of revenue, but at scale it
could generate a surplus that could be re-invested into Council services.
- In terms of target revenue – the turnover was expected to rise form
£1.6m to 3m once the new workspace schemes were fully occupied.
- Canopy had a letting policy around creative design. Efforts were made to avoid replicating
the LCB Depot, and people could choose where they were best suited. Nine companies had signed up so far, one
of these was rg+p, who had been the architects
of the scheme who had previously been at risk of leaving the city. Another company in Canopy were a leather
conservation company from Northamptonshire who had a strong partnership
with De Montfort University and would be establishing a repair shop in
Canopy to restore leather objects.
- The Council were in conversation with Leicester start-ups to
support scalable technology businesses who may want to move in.
- Companies wanted to be part of an entrepreneurial community, and
this was being established at canopy.
- Members could visit the site and would be invited to the launch.
AGREED:
1)
That the presentation be noted.
2)
That comments made by members of
this commission to be taken into account.
3)
The members would be invited to
the Canopy launch events