Councillor Waddington left the meeting prior to the
consideration of this item.
Councillor Rae Bhatia left the meeting prior to the
consideration of this item.
Councillor Cassidy Chaired the meeting from this
item onwards.
The
Director of Tourism, Culture and Economy gave a presentation to
update the commission on Workspaces Capital Funding using the
slides attached.
Additional key points included:
- The
Council had been growing a very successful workspace portfolio over
many years, and in particular in the
last 18 months.
- Dock
3-5 opened in Autumn 2024 and was focussed on innovation technology
businesses, with a mix of office space and light commercial
space.
- Dock
3-5 funding had come from the Levelling-up fund in which one scheme
per MP could be applied for, the project of the MP in question had
been support for the Enterprise Zone at Space City around the
National Space Centre. The Council had
been required to provide match funding.
- The
initial grant-payment was non-repayable, and the Council could
generate revenue and create jobs from the workspace. It could also generate a surplus that could be
invested in Council services.
- The
city also had a strength in creative design. Pilot House had
previously been the largest undeveloped building in Council
ownership in the city centre and had been underused for many
years. The council had been successful
in securing significant Levelling-up funding for this and had
provided match-funding, to transform the building into Canopy, with
a focus on the creative design sector.
- Canopy
was undergoing fit-out works, particularly by the external
café-bar operator and associated electrical
works.
- Canopy
had created 26 workspaces both large and small which were already
proving popular. The target occupancy
for Canopy was 40% within the first year of opening, and it was
already at 38% occupancy several months before opening. This was
the best early performance for a new workspace scheme to
date.
- The
focus was on developing a community of like-minded businesses that
could be supported and could support each other.
- Canopy
had conference facilities and an exhibition gallery and workshops,
so it would be a platform for growth.
The
Commission were invited to ask questions and make comments. Key
points included:
- At
optimum occupancy (90%), the whole portfolio was expected to
generate a surplus of £600k per year for the
Council. This had been factored into
the budget savings profile for the Council. This did not cost the Council in terms of revenue,
but at scale it could generate a surplus that could be re-invested
into Council services.
- In
terms of target revenue – the turnover was expected to rise
form £1.6m to 3m once the new workspace schemes were fully
occupied.
- Canopy
had a letting policy around creative design. Efforts were made to avoid replicating the LCB
Depot, and people could choose where they were best
suited. Nine companies had signed up so
far, one of these was rg+p, who had
been the architects of the scheme who had previously been at risk
of leaving the city. Another company in
Canopy were a leather conservation company from Northamptonshire
who had a strong partnership with De Montfort University and would
be establishing a repair shop in Canopy to restore leather
objects.
- The
Council were in conversation with Leicester start-ups to support
scalable technology businesses who may want to move in.
- Companies wanted to be part of an entrepreneurial community, and
this was being established at canopy.
- Members could visit the site and would be invited to the
launch.
AGREED:
1)
That the presentation be
noted.
2)
That comments made by members of this
commission to be taken into
account.
3)
The members would be invited to the
Canopy launch events