The Director of Finance submitted a report setting
out the City Mayor’s proposed Draft General Fund Revenue
Budget for 2026/27.
It was noted that cost mitigating work
had been undertaken in social care, and it was suggested to roll
this into a third year as it had been very
successful.
Members were invited to ask questions and make
comments, the
following was noted:
- With regard
to queries about
the recommendations made by the Adult Social Care Scrutiny
Commission, it was noted that comments from the commissions were
collated, and it was up to the City Mayor if they were incorporated
in the budget.
- In response to queries about figures that were
not yet available, it was noted that these figures would be
updated and members would be made aware
of their implications. It was further
clarified that with relation to Core Spending Power, this included
Council Tax rises, and did not take
inflation or cost pressures into account. It was noted that government money would help, but
it would not prevent the Council from going into reserves over the
next four years and spending more than its
income.
- It was further added that Core Spending Power
increases quoted by Government were based on the 2024/25 financial
year, and some of these increases had already been built into the
strategy. It was also noted that some
of the increase was due to the recognition of the deprivation in
the City, deprivation also links to
additional costs.
- With regard to Local Government Reorganisation
(LGR), it was acknowledged that there would be initial costs, but
these would be off-set by savings and
the payback was quick. It was added
that the government had confirmed that they expected existing
council budgets to fund LGR.
- With regard
to underspend in
Adult Social Care (ASC), it was explained that this was often in
relation to vacancies, and income came from the NHS for package
costs.
- It was further noted with
regard to ASC that contracts with providers had an annual
increase to take account in rises in the national living
wage. Significant improvements had been
made in 2025/26, and package costs had been brought
down.
- In response to points made about providing
resources for Adventure Playgrounds, it was noted that the City
Mayor had been meeting with five of them and the issues they faced
included issues around tenure and land
and they were looking for ways to be more
sustainable.
- In response to points made on the reliance on
reserves, it was explained that it was necessary to work to a
balanced income and expenditure budget, and this was always the
target. The Council had a budget
strategy that did not need capital receipts or a capitalisation
directive. There had been lower use of
reserves than last year, so the approach was
working.
- In response to points made on the ASC precept, it
was explained that the ASC precept this year had been £3.5m,
but growth had been £13m, so the increase had not been
covered.
A recommendation was MOVED by Cllr Kitterick and
SECONDED by Cllr Waddington that the provision of resources to
allow the sustainable continuation of the Adventure Playground
network.
Upon being put to the vote, the recommendation was
AGREED.
The City Mayor committed to update members on this
before Full Council.
AGREED:
1) That the report be noted.
2) That the recommendations for Full
Council be noted by the committee.
3) That
comments made by members of this commission to be taken into
account by the lead officers.
4) OSC recommended that it would like the
provision of resources to allow for the sustainable continuation of
the Adventure Playground network.
Councillor Kitterick left the meeting
following the consideration of this item.