The Director of
Finance submitted a report setting out the City Mayor’s proposed Draft General
Fund Revenue Budget for 2026/27.
It was noted that cost mitigating work had been
undertaken in social care, and it was suggested to roll this into a third year
as it had been very successful.
Members were invited to ask questions and make comments, the following was noted:
- With regard to queries about the recommendations made by the Adult Social Care
Scrutiny Commission, it was noted that comments from the commissions were
collated, and it was up to the City Mayor if they were incorporated in the
budget.
- In response to queries
about figures that were not yet available, it was noted that these figures
would be updated and members would be made aware
of their implications. It was
further clarified that with relation to Core Spending Power, this included
Council Tax rises, and did not take inflation or
cost pressures into account. It was
noted that government money would help, but it would not prevent the
Council from going into reserves over the next four years and spending
more than its income.
- It was further added that
Core Spending Power increases quoted by Government were based on the
2024/25 financial year, and some of these increases had already been built
into the strategy. It was also
noted that some of the increase was due to the recognition of the
deprivation in the City, deprivation also links
to additional costs.
- With regard to Local
Government Reorganisation (LGR), it was acknowledged that there would be
initial costs, but these would be off-set by
savings and the payback was quick.
It was added that the government had confirmed that they expected
existing council budgets to fund LGR.
- With regard to underspend in Adult Social Care (ASC), it was explained that this
was often in relation to vacancies, and income came from the NHS for
package costs.
- It was further noted with regard to ASC that contracts with providers had an
annual increase to take account in rises in the national living wage. Significant improvements had been made
in 2025/26, and package costs had been brought down.
- In response to points made
about providing resources for Adventure Playgrounds, it was noted that the
City Mayor had been meeting with five of them and the issues they faced
included issues around tenure and land and they
were looking for ways to be more sustainable.
- In response to points made
on the reliance on reserves, it was explained that it was necessary to
work to a balanced income and expenditure budget, and this was always the
target. The Council had a budget
strategy that did not need capital receipts or a capitalisation
directive. There had been lower use
of reserves than last year, so the approach was working.
- In response to points made
on the ASC precept, it was explained that the ASC precept this year had
been £3.5m, but growth had been £13m, so the increase had not been
covered.
A
recommendation was MOVED by Cllr Kitterick and SECONDED by Cllr Waddington that
the provision of resources to allow the sustainable continuation of the
Adventure Playground network.
Upon being
put to the vote, the recommendation was AGREED.
The City
Mayor committed to update members on this before Full Council.
AGREED:
1) That the report be noted.
2) That the recommendations for Full Council be noted by the committee.
3) That comments made by members of this
commission to be taken into account by the lead officers.
4) OSC recommended that it would like the provision of resources to
allow for the sustainable continuation of the Adventure Playground network.
Councillor Kitterick left the meeting following the consideration of
this item.