The Director of Housing submitted a report
providing an update on the latest review of the Housing Pop-up
Offices.
The report was taken as read.
In discussions with Members, the following was
noted:
- In response to points made about the
location of the pop-up office at Porkpie Library, it was explained
that this site was chosen as it could service residents of both
Saffron and Eyers Monsell. It was
important that places were picked that could service communities,
and suitable council buildings were needed that could serve both
main estates and pockets of housing.
Whilst it would be desirable to service smaller community areas by
using sites such as the Eyres Monsell Centre, there was a budget
that needed to be worked within that came directly from the Housing
Revenue Account (HRA). However, it was
aimed to keep open the possibility of setting up offices that were
more local.
- The Tenants’ Scrutiny Panel
had given positive feedback on pop-up offices, and it was aimed to
make the pop-up offices permanent, and it was being looked at as to
how to roll this out. Mapping had shown
that residents were accessing offices from their
locations. The Tenants’ Scrutiny
Panel would be asked where they thought it would be best to
invest.
- In response to a query about the
small sample size for the survey of 53 responses, it was noted that
more data-collection had been asked for. The reasons for people’s attendance at the
office had been looked at. It would be
looked to collect more data. It was
clarified that the responses came from a survey, and in December
there had been a focus on the HRA consultation, and there had now
been 136 surveys completed and there had been a 98% satisfaction
rate.
- Responding to queries about cost and
resources, it was noted that officer resource was made use of, when
led to time taken away from other aspects of the officers’
roles, however, more officer resource had been agreed in the HRA
budget to support pop-ups.
- It was noted that feedback had been
taken back to the Executive and it had been ensured that
communities were mapped and services were provided to
them. It was necessary to think
strategically about which services were going where.
- It was important to ensure that
there were buildings in key places to serve housing stock. The
multi-service hub model was recognised, however, it was also
important to note that some services differed depending on their
communities. There could be benefits to
combining services, but it was necessary to be strategic.
- With regard to opening times, these
were limited with resources, however, there were other channels
outside of opening times such as online and via
telephone. It was necessary to open at
the times which were busiest and which received the most
enquiries. Timings had been adjusted
from 11am-3pm and were now 10am-2pm as people had expressed that
they needed to attend earlier, for example, to tie in with school
drop-off.
- Most people became aware of the f
the hubs, through word-of-mouth, although information was sent out
with rent letters, promoted online and through ward
councillors. It was aimed to send out
further communications via social media.
- Council tax staff had been asked to
attend the pop-ups to assist residents.
They had not been able to attend so far but had given numbers by
which they could be contacted.
AGREED:
1)
That the presentation be noted.
2)
That comments made by members of this commission to be taken into
account.