The Director of Housing submitted a report providing an
update on the latest review of the Housing Pop-up Offices.
The report was taken as read.
In discussions with Members, the following was noted:
- In response to points made
about the location of the pop-up office at Porkpie Library, it was
explained that this site was chosen as it could service residents of both
Saffron and Eyers Monsell. It was
important that places were picked that could service communities, and
suitable council buildings were needed that could serve both main estates
and pockets of housing. Whilst it
would be desirable to service smaller community areas by using sites such
as the Eyres Monsell Centre, there was a budget that needed to be worked
within that came directly from the Housing Revenue Account (HRA). However, it was aimed to keep open the
possibility of setting up offices that were more local.
- The Tenants’ Scrutiny
Panel had given positive feedback on pop-up offices, and it was aimed to
make the pop-up offices permanent, and it was being looked at as to how to
roll this out. Mapping had shown
that residents were accessing offices from their locations. The Tenants’ Scrutiny Panel would be
asked where they thought it would be best to invest.
- In response to a query
about the small sample size for the survey of 53 responses, it was noted
that more data-collection had been asked for. The reasons for people’s attendance at
the office had been looked at. It
would be looked to collect more data.
It was clarified that the responses came from a survey, and in
December there had been a focus on the HRA consultation, and there had now
been 136 surveys completed and there had been a 98% satisfaction rate.
- Responding to queries
about cost and resources, it was noted that officer resource was made use
of, when led to time taken away from other aspects of the officers’ roles,
however, more officer resource had been agreed in the HRA budget to
support pop-ups.
- It was noted that feedback
had been taken back to the Executive and it had been ensured that
communities were mapped and services were provided to them. It was necessary to think strategically
about which services were going where.
- It was important to ensure
that there were buildings in key places to serve housing stock. The
multi-service hub model was recognised, however, it was also important to
note that some services differed depending on their communities. There could be benefits to combining
services, but it was necessary to be strategic.
- With regard to opening
times, these were limited with resources, however, there were other
channels outside of opening times such as online and via telephone. It was necessary to open at the times
which were busiest and which received the most enquiries. Timings had been adjusted from 11am-3pm
and were now 10am-2pm as people had expressed that they needed to attend
earlier, for example, to tie in with school drop-off.
- Most people became aware
of the f the hubs, through word-of-mouth, although information was sent
out with rent letters, promoted online and through ward councillors. It was aimed to send out further
communications via social media.
- Council tax staff had been
asked to attend the pop-ups to assist residents. They had not been able to attend so far
but had given numbers by which they could be contacted.
AGREED:
1)
That the presentation be noted.
2)
That comments made by members of this commission
to be taken into account.