The Director, Planning, Transportation and Economic Development submits a report on planning applications received for consideration by the Panel.
Minutes:
A) 127-133 GRANBY STREET
Planning Application 20152417
Demolition and redevelopment
The panel supported the proposal, noting that the front elevation of the new build had interesting articulation and good depth; having a positive impact upon the streetscene.
They were happy with the height of the development, as the top floor is recessed, reducing its visual impact upon the street.
No Objections
B) 61 GREAT CENTRAL STREET
Planning Application 20151041
Demolition and redevelopment
Concerns were raised over the height of the 7-storey extension, as it will exceed the height of the original factory building and conflicts with the height parameters as set out within the Waterside SPD. The panel suggested that the extension needed to have a lower perceived height and that this could be achieved by limiting the extension to 6-storey. They did however like the articulation of the top floor of the extension and would wish for this to remain, albeit in a lower extension.
The panel noted that the set-back of the stairwell was beneficial, as it allows you to appreciate the corner of the original factory building; the retention of the cartouche on the opposite gable was also welcomed (subject to a suitable method statement). They were happy with the general design and palette of materials proposed.
Seek Amendments
___________________________________________________________________
C) FORMER BLACK BOY PH ALBION STREET
Planning Application 20151948
Demolition and redevelopment
The panel raised strong objections to the proposal, stating that they did not wish to see the loss of the former Black Boy PH and that they would prefer to see the façade retained as a minimum.
Notwithstanding their objection to the principle of the proposal, concerns were also raised over the size, scale and design of the new build. It was noted that the building was too tall, that the silver brick finish is inappropriate for the location and that the development doesn’t contribute to the prominent corner location. They did however concede that that the brick/glazing ratio of the elevations was good and that the recessed & curved ground floor works.
Objections
__________________________________________________________________
D) THE GUILDHALL
Listed Building Consent 20160150
New sign
The proposed signage was considered acceptable, as the panel appreciated the need to improve the visual awareness of the Guildhall and were satisfied that the signage was reversible, having minimal impact upon the historic fabric.
They did however insist that fixings are positioned within the mortar joints and wish for the council to carefully control the method of fixation.
No Objections
__________________________________________________________________
E) QUEEN STREET, ATHENA
Listed Building Consent 20160220, Planning Application 20160004
Three storey extension
The majority of the panel accepted the principle of a 3-storey extension to the side of the Athena above the existing kitchen block, noting that it will appear subservient to the listed building.
Concerns were however raised over the design of the extension. The panel felt that a polite extension was proposed, but that they would prefer a more stand-alone and contemporary addition.
The panel discussed exactly how this could be achieved, but members had very mixed views, with no real agreement over the correct approach to achieve this. It was however agreed that Upvc windows are wholly inappropriate. Concerns were also raised over the use of a matching brick & how difficult this may be to achieve.
Objections
__________________________________________________________________
F) 31 SANVEY LANE
Planning Application 20160169
New house, extension
The panel supported the proposal, as the new house is of an appropriate size, scale, design and positioning, fitting better into the existing site, preserving the character and appearance of the Aylestone conservation area.
The 2-storey rear extension to the original house is also acceptable, as it will be hidden away from the streetscene, having negligible impact.
No Objections
G) 54A WESTCOTES DRIVE
Planning Application 20160181
Demolition of coach house, two storey building
Objections were raised to the proposal, as the loss of the existing coach house is unacceptable, as the building is of historic / architectural interest, positively contributing to the character and appearance of the West End conservation area.
The panel recommended that the existing building should be retained and sympathetically converted.
Objections
__________________________________________________________________
The panel had no objections/observations on the following applications:
___________________________________________________________________
H) 16 KNIGHTON ROAD
Planning Application 20152338
Change of use, alterations
___________________________________________________________________
I) 2 KNIGHTON PARK ROAD
Planning Application 20160132
Demolition of garage, single storey building
___________________________________________________________________
J) 7 BURLINGTON ROAD
Planning Application 20160040
Replacement windows
___________________________________________________________________
K) 21-23 FOSSE ROAD CENTRAL
Advertisement Consent 20160057
Two non-illuminated signs
___________________________________________________________________
L) ABBEY PARK REFRESHMENT ROOMS
Planning Application 20160015
External alterations
___________________________________________________________________
M) 201 KNIGHTON ROAD, THE CRADOCK PH
Advertisement Consent 20160146
Replacement signage
___________________________________________________________________
N) 53A LONDON ROAD
Planning Application 20160131
Replacement windows and doors
___________________________________________________________________
O) 184-186 LONDON ROAD
Planning Application 20160144
External alterations to side elevation
___________________________________________________________________
P) 19 HOLMFIELD ROAD
Planning Application 20160233
Rear extension
___________________________________________________________________
Q) 50 MAIN STREET, EVINGTON
Planning Applications 20152344
Access ramp
___________________________________________________________________
R) WELLINGTON STREET
Listed Building Consent 20160019, Advertisement Consent 20152172
New sign
___________________________________________________________________
S) 5 HOTEL STREET
Listed Building Consent 20152275, Advertisement Consent 20152274
New signs
___________________________________________________________________
T) 90 HIGH STREET CAFÉ BRUXELLES
Advertisement Consent 20152284
New sign
___________________________________________________________________
U) 7 HIGH STREET
Listed Building Consent 20160130, Advertisement Consent 20160060
New sign, feature lighting
___________________________________________________________________
V) 40-42 FRIAR LANE
Listed Building Consent 20160134
Internal and external alterations
___________________________________________________________________
W) 3-5 GALLOWTREE GATE
Listed Building Consent 20160103
External shopfront alterations
___________________________________________________________________
X) 18 GALLOWTREE GATE
Advertisement Consent 20160076
New signs
___________________________________________________________________
Y) 10 PRINCESS ROAD WEST
Planning Application 20160211
Single storey rear extension
___________________________________________________________________
Z) 5-9 UPPER BROWN STREET
Planning Application 20152365
External staircase
___________________________________________________________________
AA) 20-40 NEW WALK
Planning Application 20160249
Increase height of sprinkler tank
___________________________________________________________________
Next Meeting – Wednesday 23rd March, G.02 Meeting Room 2, City Hall
Meeting Ended – 18:25
Supporting documents: