There will be an update on the suggested highways scheme at Putney Road
Minutes:
Martin Fletcher (Head of Highways) and Stuart Maxwell (City Transport Director) were welcomed to the meeting
It was reported that a scheme at Putney Road West was being considered and a formal process of consultation would be commenced.
A presentation was given, which outlined the objectives of the scheme and provided background context of the proposals.
Concerns were expressed by residents, including representations from the Friends of Clarendon Park. The concerns were particularly raised in respect of the effect of potential increased through traffic in the area, including Victoria Park Road, and the links to the larger scheme at Evesham Road, where a potential road link had previously been cited.
The University’s plans for changes to the Freemen’s Common campus had also caused concern and the combined effect of these schemes was questioned. It was not felt by residents that each set of proposals could be considered individually or independently.
Having regard to the content of the presentation, concern was also expressed that the words used implied that the scheme would progress, regardless of the results of the formal consultation process.
Officers confirmed that if fundamental evidence was provided in opposition to the proposals, the scheme could be withdrawn. The process of bidding for Dept of Transport (DfT) finances was explained, which provided context concerning the original promotion and suggestion of the scheme. It was noted that the Council were encouraged to bid for funds that would support economic development, national productivity, and regeneration. Examples of other schemes that had been successful in receiving DfT funding were reported.
In terms of wider transport proposals, it was confirmed that each scheme would be considered on individual merits and that the success or failure of any one scheme would not affect the likely progress of another.
Councillor Kitterick disputed this comment and referred to the submission sent to the DfT, as drafted by officers, which stated that the Putney Road scheme would enhance the viability of the Evesham Road scheme. Officers explained their reasoning for the inclusion of the statement in the submission. Concerns were reiterated that the schemes could not be considered independently. Councillor Kitterick also referred to the omission of key documents in a recent Freedom of Information Act enquiry.
It was noted that the Evesham Road scheme had been included in the initial draft of the new Local Plan in its early consultation stages. It was reported that significant opposition to this inclusion had also been submitted as part of that separate consultation process.
Further concerns were expressed at the likely increase in traffic should the scheme progress, particularly in Victoria Park Road and in the vicinity of the Mayfield Road roundabout. It was suggested by residents that contradictory principles were apparent, having regard to other transport proposals in the area, such as the improved cycle routes on London Road.
It was considered by residents that this demonstrated that the overall sustainable transport policies and ambitions were flawed.
Officers accepted that the statement in the DfT submission could be better explained and would be reviewed. The results of the consultation on the scheme would be reported to a future Ward meeting when the second consultation draft of the Local Plan would also be available.
Officers were thanked for their attendance and for answering questions on the proposals.