Items
No. |
Item |
166. |
Welcome and Apologies for Absence
To issue a welcome to those present, and to
confirm if there are any apologies for absence.
Minutes:
The Chair welcomed those present to the
meeting.
Cllrs Waddington and Rae Bhatia would need to
leave the meeting at 7pm.
|
167. |
Declarations of Interest
Members are asked to declare any interests
they may have in the business to be discussed on the agenda.
Minutes:
Members were asked to declare any interests
they may have had in the business to be discussed.
There were no declarations of interest.
|
168. |
Minutes of the Previous Meeting PDF 157 KB
The minutes of the meeting of the Economic
Development, Transport and Climate Emergency Scrutiny Commission
held on Wednesday 25th June
have been circulated, and Members will be asked to confirm them as
a correct record.
Minutes:
In the item on the minutes from the previous
meeting, it incorrectly said the previous meeting was 23 April
2024, when in fact it was 23 April 2025.
AGREED:
That the minutes of the meeting of the Economic
Development, Transport and Climate Emergency Scrutiny Commission
held on 25th June be confirmed as a correct record
subject to the above correction.
|
169. |
Chair's Announcements
The Chair is invited to make any announcements
as they see fit.
Minutes:
The Chair relayed the below form the City Transport
Director:
-
The City Transport Director would once again like to
thank members of the commission for their engagement with the Local
Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plan (LCWIP).
-
Ward councillors would be invited to attend sessions
in September as part of our wider public engagement and
consultation approach - these would be arranged at parliamentary
constituency level, given that many routes ran through or adjacent
to wards.
-
Officers were reviewing the possibility of issuing
paper maps, again at parliamentary constituency level, to ward
councillors. This was likely to be done on a request basis to
minimise financial and environmental impacts, but would be an open
invitation.
-
Details would be shared of the consultation platform
and how ward councillors could make comments via that should they
wish to.
-
Officers would bring the results of the public
engagement to the commission when available, subject to
arrangements and scheduling with the commission.
The Chair announced that they would be leaving the
meeting at 7.00 pm due to another commitment. It was also noted
that Councillor Rae Bhatia would be leaving at 7.00pm. The Vice
Chair assumed the chairing of the meeting for the remainder of the
session.
|
170. |
Questions, Representations and Statements of Case
Minutes:
The Monitoring Officer reported that none had
been received.
|
171. |
Petitions
Any petitions received in accordance with
Council procedures will be reported.
Minutes:
The Monitoring Officer reported that none had
been received.
|
172. |
Market Place - Verbal Update
The Director of Tourism, Culture and Economy
gives a verbal update on the Market Place.
Minutes:
The Director of Tourism, Culture and
Economy gave a verbal update on the Market Place. It was noted
that:
- A public consultation had been conducted with around 1700
respondents, and just over 60 per cent supported locating the
market in front of the Food Hall/ Corn Exchange, equating to more
than 1000 people.
- The consultation had provided input into the future use of the
area, with strong public support for creating a major new flexible
event space in front of the Corn Exchange.
-
During the consultation process, a special Scrutiny
meeting was held in December 2024 to discuss the proposals.
Comments had been fed in to inform the scheme.
- The planning application for the public realm scheme in front of
the Corn Exchange had been submitted on 2 June, and this included
drainage, lighting and infrastructure.This application was validated by planners on 27 June and was currently in
consultation.
- Archaeological investigations were underway, as was standard for
a capital scheme of this nature, and findings were due
shortly.
-
Subject to planning permission being granted and a
formal decision to proceed, work could start on site this autumn,
and the project was still on track to complete by December
2026.
-
The market would continue to operate on Green Dragon
Square in the meantime.
- Work by the National Grid was being planned, which would install
a new electrical substation within the rear of the Corn Exchange
building. This would provide an electrical supply to serve the
wider area. This required a planning application to be submitted,
and subject to planning approval works could get
underway.
- Enabling works to facilitate this work by the National Grid were
required, and disruption for these works will be carefully
managed.
In discussions with Members it was noted
that:
- Clarification was requested regarding whether contractors had
been instructed to undertake the works. It was reported that the
original contractor for the scheme was already procured. The
contractor currently on site had undertaken demolition and
preliminary works, although no final decision had yet been made on
proceeding with the full scheme.
- Questions were raised on the future of market stalls and
traders. It was reported that the market had been relocated to
Green Dragon Square, with approximately 20 stall holders and
16-unit traders continuing to operate from that location. The
majority of stallholders had been retained, while a small number
had chosen to leave or retire.
- It was confirmed that Green Dragon Square would remain in use as
the market site until the end of 2026, at which point it would
revert to its previous use as an events space.
- The public realm planning application had been submitted, with a
decision currently expected at the end of September 2025. This
element would provide paving and infrastructure to support the
operation of the market The market structure element required
further ongoing development.
- Concerns were raised about the importance of retaining the
market’s traditional variety of goods. The current proposal
emphasised food and related products for the permanent market,
...
view the full minutes text for item 172.
|
173. |
Get LLR Working Plan PDF 135 KB
The Director of Tourism, Culture and Economy
submits a report providing an overview of the development of a Get
Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Working Plan.
Minutes:
The Commission agreed to an agenda
variance. The item on Get LLR Working
Plan was taken before the update on the Leicester and
Leicestershire Business Skills Partnership.
Councillor Rae Bhatia joined the meeting at the
opening of this item.
The
Director of Tourism, Culture and Economy submitted a report
providing an overview of the development of a Get Leicester,
Leicestershire and Rutland Working Plan.
The
Regeneration Programmes & Projects Manager joined the meeting
to assist with the discussion of this item.
The
Chair encouraged members to read the Government White paper
‘Get Britain Working’, as it had some interesting aims
in helping people start work or return to work and to remove
barriers to getting into work such as health issues and lack of
opportunity.
The
report was presented and key points included:
- The
Government agenda was aimed at addressing the challenges in the
area for economically inactive people.
- This
was a 10-year plan, so there would be time within the plan for
review as the area may change.
- The
timescale from the government was very tight for the preparation of
the initial plan, so the Council were pushing forward in developing
the plan as much as possible in the timescale.
- A
taskforce had been established in conjunction with the Department
for Work and Pensions (DWP), the Integrated Care Board (ICB),
Leicestershire County Council and Rutland County
Council.
- It was
aimed to raise the employment level to 80% in the region over
time. At this point in time, this would
require supporting 35,000 people in the region into
work.
- Table
1 of the report showed current employment statistics for the
region.
- Table
2 of the report showed that the majority
of economically inactive people were looking after family or
were long-term sick or had mental health issues or
muscular-skeletal issues.
- Retirement had increased.
- The
number of people leaving school without skills was an issue to
note.
- Labour
market analysis sat behind the priorities laid out in the
report.
- It was
necessary to map service provision so that alignment could be
explored, and it was important to engage with wider partners and
organisations
- It was
necessary to identify priorities and goals in the plan, along with
key actions, in the first year. Other
necessary actions would most likely be identified throughout the
process, and the plan would include a regular review of
progress.
- An
initial outline summary of the plan was prepared for the end of
June It was aimed to produce a draft of the plan in the coming days
and aiming for approval and publication by the end of September
2025.
The
Commission were invited to ask questions and make comments. Key
points included:
- It was
necessary to recognise that there was a challenge to get a plan
together in the tight timescale required by DWP. It was necessary to note that this was a live
piece of work and had not yet been completed. Scrutiny comments
would be helpful to inform the plan at this stage.
- Work
was being ...
view the full minutes text for item 173.
|
174. |
Update on Leicester and Leicestershire Business and Skills Partnership PDF 152 KB
The Director of Tourism, Culture and Economy
submits a report updating the Scrutiny Commission on the
development and delivery of the Business and Skills Partnership for
Leicester and Leicestershire.
Minutes:
The Director of Tourism, Culture and
Economy submitted a report to update the Commission on the
development and delivery of the Business and Skills Partnership for
Leicester and Leicestershire. It was noted that:
- The role of the Business and Skills Partnership and its
corresponding Business Board was to work with businesses and
stakeholders to drive economic growth and deliver relevant business
support initiatives at a regional level across Leicester,
Leicestershire and Rutland.
-
The partnership’s role included a
focus on dedicated enterprise zones across Leicester,
Leicestershire and Rutland, including MIRA Technology Park near
Hinckley, Loughborough University Science and Enterprise Park
(LUSEP) and Charnwood Campus in Loughborough.
-
As well as delivering skills and apprenticeship
support through the Leicester and Leicestershire Careers Hub,
delivering the government funded business support service (Growth
Hub) alongside the locally funded Create Growth programme, and
supporting local economic growth planning.
-
The work was aligned with the emerging government
plan, which set out a focus on priority growth sectors, national
policy and ideas on infrastructure, environment and places. School
places and national business growth priorities were highlighted
alongside local growth hub support.
-
A business board had been formed to provide a
business voice into local decision making, with a private sector
chair and representation from different sectors.
-
Innovation and collaboration with university
partners on employment and business skills were highlighted, with
sub-groups being established to focus on different areas and
programmes as they developed.
-
Funding was in place to support elements of
employment and business skills as national policy developed
following the closure of the Local Enterprise Partnerships
including the LLEP in 2024.
In discussions with Members, the following was
noted:
-
Concern was raised that several successful local
businesses were not represented on the board, despite their
national recognition and the valuable insight they could provide on
running successful businesses.
-
It was acknowledged that it was not possible to
include every business, as some national and global companies did
not always wish to engage, but there were opportunities to review
this and reach out to additional representatives and business
organisations across the city and county if there were any obvious
omissions.
-
Suggestions were made for other businesses that
could be approached, including large retailers and employers that
originated in Leicester, and it was agreed that the team would
review who had been contacted so far and consider further
representation.
-
Leicester was highlighted as having a distinct
economy compared with the county, with many smaller businesses and
a diverse workforce, some of whom did not have English as their
first language. Members emphasised the importance of reflecting
this in board representation if possible.
-
It was suggested that the business board should not
seek to create a parallel structure to the existing business
representative bodies such as the East Midlands Chamber or the
Federation of Small Businesses. Their involvement in the board
would help to address the challenge of how to maximise
representation from a broad range of diverse businesses and
sectors.
-
Members stressed the importance of the board making
a ...
view the full minutes text for item 174.
|
175. |
Update on Workspaces Capital Funding PDF 3 MB
The Director of Tourism, Culture and Economy
gives a presentation to update the commission on Workspaces and
Capital Funding.
Minutes:
Councillor Waddington left the meeting prior to the
consideration of this item.
Councillor Rae Bhatia left the meeting prior to the
consideration of this item.
Councillor Cassidy Chaired the meeting from this
item onwards.
The
Director of Tourism, Culture and Economy gave a presentation to
update the commission on Workspaces Capital Funding using the
slides attached.
Additional key points included:
- The
Council had been growing a very successful workspace portfolio over
many years, and in particular in the
last 18 months.
- Dock
3-5 opened in Autumn 2024 and was focussed on innovation technology
businesses, with a mix of office space and light commercial
space.
- Dock
3-5 funding had come from the Levelling-up fund in which one scheme
per MP could be applied for, the project of the MP in question had
been support for the Enterprise Zone at Space City around the
National Space Centre. The Council had
been required to provide match funding.
- The
initial grant-payment was non-repayable, and the Council could
generate revenue and create jobs from the workspace. It could also generate a surplus that could be
invested in Council services.
- The
city also had a strength in creative design. Pilot House had
previously been the largest undeveloped building in Council
ownership in the city centre and had been underused for many
years. The council had been successful
in securing significant Levelling-up funding for this and had
provided match-funding, to transform the building into Canopy, with
a focus on the creative design sector.
- Canopy
was undergoing fit-out works, particularly by the external
café-bar operator and associated electrical
works.
- Canopy
had created 26 workspaces both large and small which were already
proving popular. The target occupancy
for Canopy was 40% within the first year of opening, and it was
already at 38% occupancy several months before opening. This was
the best early performance for a new workspace scheme to
date.
- The
focus was on developing a community of like-minded businesses that
could be supported and could support each other.
- Canopy
had conference facilities and an exhibition gallery and workshops,
so it would be a platform for growth.
The
Commission were invited to ask questions and make comments. Key
points included:
- At
optimum occupancy (90%), the whole portfolio was expected to
generate a surplus of £600k per year for the
Council. This had been factored into
the budget savings profile for the Council. This did not cost the Council in terms of revenue,
but at scale it could generate a surplus that could be re-invested
into Council services.
- In
terms of target revenue – the turnover was expected to rise
form £1.6m to 3m once the new workspace schemes were fully
occupied.
- Canopy
had a letting policy around creative design. Efforts were made to avoid replicating the LCB
Depot, and people could choose where they were best
suited. Nine companies had signed up so
far, one of these was rg+p, who had
been the architects of the scheme who had previously been at risk
of leaving the city. ...
view the full minutes text for item 175.
|
176. |
Work Programme PDF 75 KB
Members of the Commission will be asked to
consider the work programme and make suggestions for additional
items as it considers necessary.
Minutes:
|
177. |
Any Other Business
Minutes:
There being no further items of urgent
business, the meeting finished at 19:14.
|